Click for latest discussions

“Oxus treasure” back home?

Posted by Vadim | in History, Tradition, Culture | on April 4th, 2007
Tags: No Tags

Well, first of all I want to mention that Tajik media has already started calling the president of Tajikistan according to his will - without the Russian ending “ov” in his family name. He is no more Emomali Rakhmonov but Emomali Rakhmon.

Recently, before his visit to Qubodiyon district in Khatlon region he met with the archeologists who work in pre-Islamic historical site – the city of Takhti Sanging on the bank of Amudarya (Oxus). He promised to support them in conservation of the site which has a historical and cultural significance for Tajikistan.

However, as usual he did not get along without making a startling statement. I’m not sure whether it can be considered as a startling statement or not, at least it will make a big resonance in London Museum. He commissioned to take measures for bringing back to Tajikistan the “Oxus treasure” (RUS) from London Museum.

The Oxus treasure is the most important surviving collection of Achaemenid Persian metalwork. It consists of about 170 objects, dating mainly from the fifth and fourth centuries BC. This was the time of the Achaemenid empire, created by Cyrus the Great (559-530 BC), when Persian control stretched from Egypt and the Aegean to Afghanistan and the Indus Valley.

To be honest, I doubt that London Museum will give back the treasure but my colleague thinks that it is possible. For example, Egypt has already received back some of the treasures which were kept in the museums of London.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

3 Responses to ' “Oxus treasure” back home? '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' “Oxus treasure” back home? '.

Comments

  1. Leila said,

    on April 4th, 2007 at 2:54 pm

    Hmm interesting. I wonder if it matters that the treaures were bought, not stolen. And honestly, how many more people would be able to see it in the London Museum than in Tajikistan…

  2. Vincent said,

    on April 5th, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    Nothing symbolizes the end of the colonial era as powerfully as a European museum giving artifacts back to their country of origin.

    But seriously, I hope the museums in Tajikistan have the equipment and personnel to properly take care of such things.

Trackbacks/Pings


Leave a reply